RESUMO
The genome of the Omicron variant of concern (VOC) contains more than 50 mutations, many of which have been associated with increased transmissibility, differing disease severity, and the potential to elute immune responses acquired after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination or infection with previous VOCs. Due to a better tropism for the upper respiratory tract, it was suggested that the detection of the Omicron variant could be preferred in saliva, compared to nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS). Our objective was to compare the SARS-CoV-2 levels in saliva fluid and NPS to estimated Ct values, according to the main SARS-CoV-2 variants circulating in France since the beginning of 2021. We analyzed 1,289 positive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results during the three major waves: Alpha, Delta, and Omicron. NPS and saliva sampling were performed for 909 (71%) and 380 (29%) cases, respectively. The Ct values were significantly lower in the NPS samples than in the saliva samples for the three main VOCs. Still, the difference was less pronounced with the Omicron variant than for the Alpha and Delta variants. In contrast, in the saliva samples, Ct values were significantly lower for the Omicron variant than for the Delta (difference of -2.7 Ct) and the Alpha (difference of -3.0 Ct) variants, confirming a higher viral load in saliva. To conclude, the higher viral load in saliva was evidenced for the Omicron variant, compared to the Alpha and Delta variants, suggesting that established diagnostic methods might require revalidation with the emergence of novel variants. IMPORTANCE Established methods for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics might require revalidation with the emergence of novel variants. This is important for screening strategy programs and for the investigation of the characteristics of new variants in terms of tropism modification and increased viral burden leading to its spread. SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR screening on saliva samples reported lower but acceptable performance, compared to nasopharyngeal samples. Due to a better tropism for the upper respiratory tract, it was suggested that the detection of the Omicron variant could be preferred in saliva, compared to nasopharyngeal swabs. Our study analyzed 1,289 positive RT-PCR results during the three major waves in France: Alpha, Delta, and Omicron. Our findings also showed a higher viral load in saliva for the Omicron variant, compared to the Alpha and Delta variants.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Saliva , FrançaRESUMO
VIROLOGICAL ASPECTS, DIAGNOSTIC TOOLS AND VARIANTS OF SARS-COV-2 SARS-CoV-2 is an enveloped non-segmented linear single-stranded positive RNA virus. The envelope carries the protein spike (S) which recognizes the ACE2 receptor on the target cell and allows entry of the virus. The numerous mutations on the S protein are at the origin of a great genetic diversity, involved in the species barrier and the escape from neutralizing antibodies. The main mode of transmission is respiratory. The virus replicates 24 hours after infection and the viral RNA is detected by direct diagnostic techniques as the reference technique is RT-PCR on a nasopharyngeal sample. To expand screening, RT-PCR on saliva samples and antigenic tests have been developed. The majority of patients develop specific antibodies within 10-15 days which are detectable by serological methods. It is recommended to combine the search for anti-N and anti-S antibodies. The viral genome has great plasticity and variants emerged from the summer of 2020. There are several classifications, including that of the WHO, which assigns each variant a Greek letter. Finally, Santé publique France has deployed an epidemiological surveillance system of variants using PCR screening and sequencing.
ASPECTS VIROLOGIQUES, DIAGNOSTIC ET VARIANTS DU SARS-COV-2 Le SARS-CoV-2 est un virus enveloppé à ARN monocaténaire linéaire non segmenté de polarité positive. L'enveloppe porte la protéine Spike (S) qui reconnaît le récepteur ACE2 sur la cellule cible et permet l'entrée du virus. Les nombreuses mutations sur la protéine S sont à l'origine d'une grande diversité génétique, impliquées dans le franchissement de la barrière d'espèce et l'échappement aux anticorps neutralisants. Le mode de transmission principal est respiratoire. Le virus réplique dès vingt-quatre heures après l'infection, et l'ARN viral est détecté par les techniques de diagnostic direct ; la technique de référence est la RT-PCR sur prélèvement nasopharyngé. Pour élargir le dépistage, la RT-PCR sur prélèvement salivaire et les tests antigéniques ont été développés. La majorité des patients développent des anticorps spécifiques en dix à quinze jours, qui sont détectables par les méthodes sérologiques ; il est recommandé de combiner la recherche des anticorps anti-N (nucléocapside) et anti-S. Le génome viral est doté d'une grande plasticité, et des variants ont émergé dès l'été 2020. Il en existe plusieurs classifications dont celle de l'Organisation mondiale de la santé qui attribue à chaque variant une lettre grecque. Enfin, Santé publique France a déployé un système de surveillance épidémiologique de ces variants à l'aide de techniques de criblage et de séquençage.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticorpos Antivirais , COVID-19/diagnóstico , França , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/genética , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/metabolismoRESUMO
Type 2 heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT 2) is a rare pro-thrombotic disorder occurring in patients treated with heparin. It is defined as a clinical-biological syndrome associating the sudden onset of a thrombocytopenia, characterized by a drop of more than 50% of the initial platelet count, and thrombosis. We report two cases of HIT 2 occurring in patients with major bleeding tendency. The first HIT occurred in a patient whose management, in accordance with current guidelines, made it possible to control the thrombocytopenia and the anticoagulation despite the complexity of adapting and monitoring treatments in the context of recent cerebral hemorrhage. The second refers to an autoimmune HIT, which occurred in a patient whose management required the use of alternative therapies to the standard treatments suggested for HIT 2, to correct the severe refractory thrombocytopenia.
